Models / Lab / System 05

EPA Bargaining Engine

Models Economic Partnership Agreement renegotiation as a sequential bargaining game among an African state, the European Union and the AfCFTA Council. It connects equilibrium analysis to threat testing, sensitivity analysis, concession sequencing and coalition comparison.

Incentive Design and Strategic Interaction8 input groups7 output groups
Decision problem

What the model examines

Which negotiating threats are credible, which concessions should be offered first and how dependent is the recommended position on behavioural and structural assumptions?

Analytical method

How the model is structured

A finite perfect-information game models three actors and solves the sequence by backward induction to a subgame perfect equilibrium. Behavioural terms modify payoffs while a two-condition test determines threat credibility. Sensitivity analysis uses one-dimensional sweeps and a two-dimensional parameter grid.

Interface

What this model is built to test

  • Strategic Brief dashboard
  • Game Tree and Equilibrium view
  • Threat credibility charts
  • One and two-dimensional sensitivity views
  • Concession Sequencing
  • Peer and coalition comparison
  • Data Explorer and Methodology
Inputs

Decision controls

  • Primary and comparison countries
  • Africa and European Union discount factors
  • Behavioural parameters
  • EPA lock-in costs
  • Great-power shadow
  • AfCFTA opportunity
  • Game depth
  • Sensitivity parameters
Outputs

Analytical returns

  • Solved equilibrium and path
  • Extensive-form game tree
  • Threat credibility scores
  • Single and paired parameter sensitivity
  • Ranked concession sequence
  • Peer bargaining and coalition comparison
  • Browsable and exportable datasets
Fields of inquiry
Incentive Design and Strategic InteractionEconomic Statecraft, Trade and CoercionInstitutional and Legal DesignRisk, Uncertainty and Forecasting

Related models

Shared analytical fields